Court suppression orders are pointless in the internet age.
Not only that but the premise of this article is ridiculous. The author was specifically searching for this persons name and got a trends alert about it.
Should google censor all worldwide coverage of this event, even that written legally in other jurisdictions?
That's not what happened. Google mailed this out to anyone signed up for a Google Trends alert about New Zealand, which is a lot of people, most of whom are presumably in New Zealand where the name suppression order is in force.
Not only that but the premise of this article is ridiculous. The author was specifically searching for this persons name and got a trends alert about it.
Should google censor all worldwide coverage of this event, even that written legally in other jurisdictions?
Local media restrictions are just that, local.