Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | AznHisoka's commentslogin

Right at the precise moment I decide to git pull!

Good, now do Forbes.com

That parasite of a site still seems to rank high for many search queries, even tho their user experience is horrible (and their content too)


Not these days in my experience. Maybe 5-10 years ago. I imagine Google is so indundated with so much spam, and AI slop they are being more discrimantory on what to crawl and index

I’m looking at this from a 3rd party of view (definitely not claiming the .net “deserves” to rank higher)

1) the .net version has a couple of very high authority links, namely from theregister and thenewstack (both of which have had lots of engagement).

I highly doubt it would have ranked without those links.

2) its only been a week. Give Google time to understand which pages should rank higher.

3) Google is biased towards sites that cover a topic earlier than others.

I’ve seen pages that are still top 3 for a particular competitive query years later, simply because they were one of the first to write about it.

Suggestions: give it time. Meanwhile I would recommend linking to your website rather than your github everywhere you mention it, to give it a boost


If it saves anyone else the effort: I went to doublecheck the claim that those articles cited the wrong page, and it seems you're correct on The Register, but archive.org's earliest copies of the other two articles don't seem to reference the impostor site. They refer instead to the GitHub.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260301133636/https://www.there... https://web.archive.org/web/20260211162657/https://venturebe... https://web.archive.org/web/20260220201539/https://thenewsta...


>> I’ve seen pages that are still top 3 for a particular competitive query years later, simply because they were one of the first to write about it.

With so many copycats on the internet, first to publish seems like a fairly good indication of the original source. But as we can see here, that's not always true.


> 3) Google is biased towards sites that cover a topic earlier than others.

> I’ve seen pages that are still top 3 for a particular competitive query years later, simply because they were one of the first to write about it.

Reason why I still always get the Java 8 docs for any search. Annoying.


I think the real reason for that is simply that a lot of people are still running Java 8 (so those docs still see a lot of traffic). I remember reading that it's still used by something like 25% of Java developers.

Most of the problem is the "only been a week" part, likely. Though you're fighting an algorithm that's been patched in inconsistent places for all sorts of weights like "authority" and "quality".

Thousands of little weights driven by obscure attributes of the site that you're not really going to figure out by thrashing and changing stuff.


I think the precaution developers should take is having a website and adding a page to it for each project.

If you must just have a repo self host it. In fact, selfhost the repo in any case.


>> Nigerian

I know its unfair, but that probably didnt help calm any nerves :)


In terms of what companies are actually implementing, MCP isnt dead by a long time. Number of companies with a MCP server grew 242% in the last 6 months and is actually accelerating (according to Bloomberry) [1]

https://bloomberry.com/blog/we-analyzed-1400-mcp-servers-her...


Companies are usually chasing last year's trend, and MCP makes for an easy "look, were adopting AI!" bullet point.

Right, but even if this is just a matter of "chasing a trend", it does have a network effect and makes the entire MCP ecosystem much more useful to consumers, which begets more MCP servers.

Those databases were always worthless. Go home u drunk bot


Its much simpler than that. OpenAI is losing significant market share and this is a Hail Mary that the government will forcr troves of companies to leavr Anthropic

As an aside, there are probably lots of companies that serve the government seriously considering cutting the government as a customer.

Simply because the money/efficienct they will lose from cutting Claude will surpass the revenue they get from the gov


Same here, having YC attached to your name is not the flex you think it is, its even the opposite for me

Their brand has been associated with hacking-around and gaining advantage via rule breaking for a while. Didn't their founder application at one point ask "Tell us about a time where you hacked some system for your advantage?" At this point, I think everyone knows they're signing up for dark patterns and questionable practices when they get involved.

It still does.

> Please tell us about a time you most successfully hacked some (non-computer) system to your advantage:

I suspect it can be an excellent barometer of someone's:

- alignment in terms of pro-social vs. anti-social

- decision making under desperation

- "social filter": threading the line between 'interesting'/'compelling' vs. 'off-putting'/'concerning'

which are important signals for evaluating potential future C-suite executives.


Their brand has been associated with hacking-around and gaining advantage via rule breaking for a while.

Yup, this type of behavior is pretty much as I would expect and it's something I've seen since I first started posting here.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: